Maddox v. Witte

27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 27 S.E. 163 (Maddox v. Witte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddox v. Witte, 27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where a claim case in a justice’s court was dismissed by the justice because the claim was not filed in time, it appearing without contradiction tha/t the claim was filed ■after the time t'he property was to have been sold according to ithe advertisement of the constable, certiorari and not appeal was the remedy for the claimant. Small v. Sparks, 69 Ga. 745; Rogers v. Bennett, 78 Ga. 707; Hall v. Carlisle, 92 Ga. 318.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Maddox & Terrell, for plaintiffs in error. G. B. Reynolds, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dahlonega Chevrolet Co. v. Tate
162 S.E. 403 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Wage Earners Real Estate Co. v. Gaulden
159 S.E. 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Hollis v. Doster
38 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Humphries v. Blalock
28 S.E. 165 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-witte-ga-1896.