Maddox v. Witte

27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 21, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

Where a claim case in a justice’s court was dismissed by the justice because the claim was not filed in time, it appearing without contradiction tha/t the claim was filed ■after the time t'he property was to have been sold according to ithe advertisement of the constable, certiorari and not appeal was the remedy for the claimant. Small v. Sparks, 69 Ga. 745; Rogers v. Bennett, 78 Ga. 707; Hall v. Carlisle, 92 Ga. 318.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Maddox & Terrell, for plaintiffs in error. G. B. Reynolds, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. Witte, 27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583 (Ga. 1896).

27 S.E. 163 (Maddox v. Witte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dahlonega Chevrolet Co. v. Tate
162 S.E. 403 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Wage Earners Real Estate Co. v. Gaulden
159 S.E. 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Hollis v. Doster
38 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Humphries v. Blalock
28 S.E. 165 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)