Maddox v. Witte
27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583
Opinion
Where a claim case in a justice’s court was dismissed by the justice because the claim was not filed in time, it appearing without contradiction tha/t the claim was filed ■after the time t'he property was to have been sold according to ithe advertisement of the constable, certiorari and not appeal was the remedy for the claimant. Small v. Sparks, 69 Ga. 745; Rogers v. Bennett, 78 Ga. 707; Hall v. Carlisle, 92 Ga. 318.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maddox v. Witte, 27 S.E. 163, 100 Ga. 316, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 583 (Ga. 1896).
27 S.E. 163 (Maddox v. Witte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dahlonega Chevrolet Co. v. Tate
162 S.E. 403 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Wage Earners Real Estate Co. v. Gaulden
159 S.E. 910 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Hollis v. Doster
38 S.E. 308 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Humphries v. Blalock
28 S.E. 165 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)