Maddox v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center
This text of 438 So. 2d 1041 (Maddox v. Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-appellant was unable to produce expert medical evidence to support her medical malpractice action, and her belated attempt to secure such evidence after the trial court granted appellees’ motions for summary judgment was denied. We affirm the summary final judgment in appellees’ favor on authority of Sims v. Helms, 345 So.2d 721 (Fla.1977); Coffman Realty, Inc. v. Tosohatchee Game Preserve, Inc., 381 So.2d 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), aff’d 413 So.2d 1 (Fla.1982); Willis v. L.W. Foster Sportswear Co., Inc., 352 So.2d 922 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1977). National Properties, Inc. v. Balinger Corporation, 277 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1973), relied upon by appellant, ap[1042]*1042pears to have no vitality in view of the Florida Supreme Court’s approval of Coff-man, supra. See, Stolzenburg v. Forte Towers South, Inc., 430 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1983), agreeing with Coffman that admissibility of an affidavit in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, filed in conjunction with a motion for rehearing, is a matter within the discretion of the trial court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 So. 2d 1041, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-tallahassee-memorial-regional-medical-center-fladistctapp-1983.