Maddox v. Stewart

16 F. Cas. 361, 2 D.C. 523, 2 Cranch 523
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1824
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 F. Cas. 361 (Maddox v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddox v. Stewart, 16 F. Cas. 361, 2 D.C. 523, 2 Cranch 523 (circtddc 1824).

Opinion

Cranci-i, C. J.,

mentioned the case of Casenove v. Darrell & Groverman, in Alexandria, [ante, 444,] in which the creditor had given a credit in order to bring his claim within the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. The debtors objected to the credit before the justice; and this Court decided that the creditor could not, without the consent of the debtor, release a part of the debt for that purpose.

The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

was of opinion that as the appellant, in the present case, did not object to the credit before the justice, his assent may now be presumed ; and that therefore the justice had jurisdiction of the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
174 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 361, 2 D.C. 523, 2 Cranch 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-stewart-circtddc-1824.