Maddox v. Stewart
This text of 16 F. Cas. 361 (Maddox v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
mentioned the case of Casenove v. Darrell & Groverman, in Alexandria, [ante, 444,] in which the creditor had given a credit in order to bring his claim within the jurisdiction of the justice of the peace. The debtors objected to the credit before the justice; and this Court decided that the creditor could not, without the consent of the debtor, release a part of the debt for that purpose.
The Court
was of opinion that as the appellant, in the present case, did not object to the credit before the justice, his assent may now be presumed ; and that therefore the justice had jurisdiction of the cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F. Cas. 361, 2 D.C. 523, 2 Cranch 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-stewart-circtddc-1824.