Maddox v. State

111 S.E. 85, 28 Ga. App. 233, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 417
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 1922
Docket13190
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 85 (Maddox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddox v. State, 111 S.E. 85, 28 Ga. App. 233, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 417 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial which are based upon the refusal of the court to admit evidence.

2. Ground 11 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is not approved by the trial judge, and can not be considered by this court.

3. Eor no reason alleged was it error for the court to fail to charge as complained of in ground 12 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.

4. The evidence authorized the verdict, which has the approval of the judge who tried the case, and, as no error of law is pointed out, this court is powerless to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, c. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 85, 28 Ga. App. 233, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-state-gactapp-1922.