Maddox v. State
68 Ga. 294
Opinion
The reopening of a case after both sides have announced closed, is a matter for the discretion of the court, and his decision will not be reversed unless decided injustice has been done thereby.
(a.) The discharge of all the witnesses on one side, after a case has been announced closed, is a good ground for refusing to reopen the case at the instance of the other party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maddox v. State, 68 Ga. 294 (Ga. 1881).
68 Ga. 294 (Maddox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herron v. State
272 S.E.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Knight
239 S.E.2d 686 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Hollins v. State
210 S.E.2d 354 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
State v. Pilegge
112 P. 263 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Bundrick v. State
54 S.E. 683 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Strickland v. State
41 S.E. 713 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)