Maddox v. State

1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1120, 2009 WL 321560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maddox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 15258
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 11, 2009·No. No. 4D07-518·Published

Opinion

DAMOORGIAN, J.

Rodney Maddox appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse as to Ground 2 because the trial court did not address all of the allegations in this ground of the motion. We remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting the remainder of the allegations in Ground 2, or for an evidentia-ry hearing. See Brown v. State, 967 So.2d 440, 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). We affirm the denial of all other grounds of the motion.

Affirmed in part; Reversed and Remanded in part.

STEVENSON, J., and PHILLIPS, CAROL-LISA, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. State, 1 So. 3d 1249, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1120, 2009 WL 321560 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

1 So. 3d 1249 (Maddox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
967 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)