Maddox v. State

583 So. 2d 1119, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8900, 1991 WL 164381
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Maddox v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 553 So. 2d 1380
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1991·No. No. 91-650·Published

Opinion

On Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant’s contention, and the state’s confession, that the trial court erroneously relied on two prior un-counseled petit theft convictions to reclassify the present such conviction to a third degree felony. Leffew v. State, 518 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); see Annechino v. State, 557 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the five year sentence under review is vacated and the cause remanded for the trial court to resentence the defendant to no more than one year imprisonment for a first degree misdemeanor. § 812.014(2)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989).1

Vacated, remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. State, 583 So. 2d 1119, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8900, 1991 WL 164381 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 1119 (Maddox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Annechino v. State
557 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Leffew v. State
518 So. 2d 1376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)