Maddox v. State

583 So. 2d 1119, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8900, 1991 WL 164381
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 1991
DocketNo. 91-650
StatusPublished

This text of 583 So. 2d 1119 (Maddox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddox v. State, 583 So. 2d 1119, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8900, 1991 WL 164381 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

On Confession of Error

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellant’s contention, and the state’s confession, that the trial court erroneously relied on two prior un-counseled petit theft convictions to reclassify the present such conviction to a third degree felony. Leffew v. State, 518 So.2d 1376 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); see Annechino v. State, 557 So.2d 915 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the five year sentence under review is vacated and the cause remanded for the trial court to resentence the defendant to no more than one year imprisonment for a first degree misdemeanor. § 812.014(2)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989).1

Vacated, remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Annechino v. State
557 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Leffew v. State
518 So. 2d 1376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
583 So. 2d 1119, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8900, 1991 WL 164381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.