Maddox v. State

438 So. 2d 959, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22393
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 5, 1983·No. No. 83-588·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of thirty years for attempted murder and robbery and a concurrent term of five years for grand theft. The court retained jurisdiction over the first half of both thirty-year sentences.1 Section 947.-16(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1982), provides that when an individual is convicted of two or more felonies and concurrent sentences are imposed, jurisdiction of the trial court shall apply only to the first half of the maximum sentence imposed for the highest felony charged and proven. Accordingly, this cause is remanded with instructions that the court strike the reservation of jurisdiction from one of the thirty-year sentences. Otherwise, the judgments and sentences are affirmed.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. State, 438 So. 2d 959, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

438 So. 2d 959 (Maddox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Llida v. State
501 So. 2d 162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Famiglietti v. State
499 So. 2d 57 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Emshwiller v. State
464 So. 2d 1339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)