Maddox v. State

372 So. 2d 1145, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15176
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 1979
DocketNo. LL-76
StatusPublished

This text of 372 So. 2d 1145 (Maddox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddox v. State, 372 So. 2d 1145, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

We affirm appellant’s conviction for buying, receiving, and/or aiding in the concealment of stolen property. His first point, claiming error in certain comments made by the prosecutor, is not preserved for appeal under Clark v. State, 363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978) because he did not move for a mistrial. His second point, alleging that the court should have instructed the jury on the law relating to circumstantial evidence, is controlled by this court’s decision in Boyd v. State, 122 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960) since the state did not rely solely on circumstantial evidence to support the conviction.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. State
363 So. 2d 331 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Boyd v. State
122 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
372 So. 2d 1145, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-state-fladistctapp-1979.