Maddox v. State

236 So. 2d 469, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6331
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 16, 1970·No. No. M-121·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record, briefs and argument of counsel have been carefully considered, and the cases cited by appellant given proper consideration, but this court is of the opinion, and so holds, that the holding of the 3rd District Court of Appeal of Florida in Hoskins v. State, 208 So.2d 145, is controlling and applicable in this case and therefore the judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. State, 236 So. 2d 469, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6331 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

236 So. 2d 469 (Maddox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Gladding
585 N.E.2d 838 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)
Gibson v. State
368 So. 2d 667 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)