Maddox v. State ex rel. Swann
4 H. & J. 539
Opinion
It has been established, that in order to take advantage of the act of limitations it must be pleaded. The court concur with the court below in the opinions expressed in the several bills of exceptions.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maddox v. State ex rel. Swann, 4 H. & J. 539 (Md. 1819).
4 H. & J. 539 (Maddox v. State ex rel. Swann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Grace v. Thompson
182 A. 573 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1936)
Newlin v. Mercantile Trust Co.
158 A. 51 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1932)
McIntire v. McIntire
192 U.S. 116 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Plummer v. Shepherd
51 A. 173 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1902)
McIntire v. McIntire
14 App. D.C. 337 (D.C. Circuit, 1899)
Brittain v. Carson
46 Md. 186 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1877)