Maddox v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word

506 So. 2d 233
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 29, 1987·No. No. W87-408·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WRIT DENIED: We reject the trial court’s determination that La.R.S. 23:1102(B) has no effect with regard to an unapproved compromise agreement con-fected between the employee and a third person/tortfeasor where no suit was previously filed. However, defendant is not entitled to summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s suit. Defendant may be liable, despite the unapproved compromise, for any amounts due plaintiff in worker’s compensation and medical benefits which accrued during the period February 19, 1986 (date of accident) and July 31,1986 (date of unapproved compromise agreement) as La. R.S. 23:1102(B) by specific provision effects a forfeiture of “the right to future compensation, including medical expenses. Further, defendant may also be liable for future benefits if plaintiff avoids forfeiture of those benefits by complying with La. R.S. 23:1102(B).

GUIDRY, DOUCET and YELVERTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word, 506 So. 2d 233 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

506 So. 2d 233 (Maddox v. Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeansonne v. American Native Const.
710 So. 2d 306 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1998)
Faught v. RYDER/P I E NATIONWIDE, INC.
543 So. 2d 918 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1989)