Maddox v. Reese

Ohio Supreme Court

Maddox v. Reese

9 N.E.2d 1, 132 Ohio St. 465, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 465, 8 Ohio Op. 412, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 215

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1937

Docket26061

StatusPublished

This text of 9 N.E.2d 1 (Maddox v. Reese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maddox v. Reese, 9 N.E.2d 1, 132 Ohio St. 465, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 465, 8 Ohio Op. 412, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 215 (Ohio 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Day, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this case (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. Day, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 N.E.2d 1, 132 Ohio St. 465, 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 465, 8 Ohio Op. 412, 1937 Ohio LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-reese-ohio-1937.