Maddox v. Pulliam

5 Blackf. 205, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 98
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 21, 1839·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Blackford, J.

Pulliam sued Maddox in debt upon a writing obligatory. Plea, that the obligation was obtained by fraud and covin. Replication in denial of the plea. There were also several other pleas in bar, upon which issues were joined. When the cause was called for trial, the defendant failed to appear, and the Court, on the plaintiff’s motion, rendered final judgment against the defendant for the amount of the obligation, with interest and costs.

This judgment is erroneous. The defendant’s default in not appearing at the calling of the cause after the issues joined, did not authorize the judgment rendered against him. The plaintiff should have had the issues tried by a jury in the same manner as if the defendant had appeared. 11 Petersd. 644, note.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issues set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddox v. Pulliam, 5 Blackf. 205, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 98 (Ind. 1839).

5 Blackf. 205 (Maddox v. Pulliam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halsey v. Meinrath
54 Mo. App. 335 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Firestone v. Firestone
78 Ind. 534 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)
Terrell v. State ex rel. Root
68 Ind. 155 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Ellison v. Cain
2 Ind. 236 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1850)
Brown v. Hollenbeck
2 Greene 318 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1849)
Owen v. Moore
8 Blackf. 79 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1846)