Maddox v. Pulliam
This text of 5 Blackf. 205 (Maddox v. Pulliam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pulliam sued Maddox in debt upon a writing obligatory. Plea, that the obligation was obtained by fraud and covin. Replication in denial of the plea. There were also several other pleas in bar, upon which issues were joined. When the cause was called for trial, the defendant failed to appear, and the Court, on the plaintiff’s motion, rendered final judgment against the defendant for the amount of the obligation, with interest and costs.
This judgment is erroneous. The defendant’s default in not appearing at the calling of the cause after the issues joined, did not authorize the judgment rendered against him. The plaintiff should have had the issues tried by a jury in the same manner as if the defendant had appeared. 11 Petersd. 644, note.
The judgment is reversed, and the proceedings subsequent to the issues set aside, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Blackf. 205, 1839 Ind. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-pulliam-ind-1839.