Maddox v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Maddox v. Jackson

4 Munf. 462, 18 Va. 462, 1815 Va. LEXIS 36

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedOctober 30, 1815

StatusPublished

Cited by16 cases

This text of 4 Munf. 462 (Maddox v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maddox v. Jackson, 4 Munf. 462, 18 Va. 462, 1815 Va. LEXIS 36 (Va. 1815).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Brooke

delivered the court’s opinion as follows :

The court, considering the instruction to the jury stated in the bill of exceptions as confined to the warrant, the endorsement thereon, and the recognizance, and as not excluding from the jury the other evidence stated in the bill of exceptions, or any other testimony which might have been .offered by the plaintiff to disprove the probable cause inferible from the aforesaid proceedings before the magistrate, is of opinion, that the said instruction was correct, and no invasion of the sacred trial by jury. The inference from the proceedings and trial before the magistrate is founded on the legal presumption that magistrates and courts are indifferent, and without malice, as to the accused; a presumption that is equivalent to a rule of law, and which ought not to be unsettled by the variable verdicts of juries. The court therefore affirms the judgment,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Brooke

delivered the court’s opinion as follows :

The court, considering the instruction to the jury stated in the bill of exceptions as confined to the warrant, the endorsement thereon, and the recognizance, and as not excluding from the jury the other evidence stated in the bill of exceptions, or any other testimony which might have been .offered by the plaintiff to disprove the probable cause inferible from the aforesaid proceedings before the magistrate, is of opinion, that the said instruction was correct, and no invasion of the sacred trial by jury. The inference from the proceedings and trial before the magistrate is founded on the legal presumption that magistrates and courts are indifferent, and without malice, as to the accused; a presumption that is equivalent to a rule of law, and which ought not to be unsettled by the variable verdicts of juries. The court therefore affirms the judgment,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Munf. 462, 18 Va. 462, 1815 Va. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-jackson-va-1815.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack