Maddox v. Hogin

California Court of Appeal

Maddox v. Hogin

119 Cal. App. 230

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

DocketCiv. No. 4588

StatusPublished

This text of 119 Cal. App. 230 (Maddox v. Hogin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maddox v. Hogin, 119 Cal. App. 230 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE

It satisfactorily appearing from the certificate of the clerk of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County wherein the above-entitled action was tried, that judgment was rendered on the twenty-seventh day of January, 1931; that on the tenth day of April, 1931, the plaintiff filed notice of appeal to this court, under the provisions of section 953, Code' of Civil Procedure; that on [231]*231April 10, 1931, a request was made of the shorthand reporter to prepare a transcript of the testimony taken in said cause; that no undertaking has been filed with the court for costs on appeal; that no proceedings for a bill of exceptions are pending in the trial court; that there is on file in said court an order terminating proceedings to obtain a transcript on appeal, which was entered on the ninth day of November, 1931.

From which it follows that the appeal in this cause should be dismissed. And it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE

It satisfactorily appearing from the certificate of the clerk of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County wherein the above-entitled action was tried, that judgment was rendered on the twenty-seventh day of January, 1931; that on the tenth day of April, 1931, the plaintiff filed notice of appeal to this court, under the provisions of section 953, Code' of Civil Procedure; that on [231]*231April 10, 1931, a request was made of the shorthand reporter to prepare a transcript of the testimony taken in said cause; that no undertaking has been filed with the court for costs on appeal; that no proceedings for a bill of exceptions are pending in the trial court; that there is on file in said court an order terminating proceedings to obtain a transcript on appeal, which was entered on the ninth day of November, 1931.

From which it follows that the appeal in this cause should be dismissed. And it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 Cal. App. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-hogin-calctapp-1931.