Maddox v. Dial
This text of 34 Tex. 571 (Maddox v. Dial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was brought by the former wards of Dial against him and his securities on his bond as guardian. .
There was a verdict and judgment rendered for the defendants.
The principal error relied upon by the appellants is the following charge of the court: “ That the plaintiffs having failed to
read in evidence the bond of Dial, or a copy of the same, the jury cannot return a verdict against Dial’s securities.”
We are of opinion there is no error in this charge. But independent of' the charge, which applied only to the securities on the-bond, the jury, with all the facts before them, rendered a verdict in favor of the principal, Dial.
The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Tex. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddox-v-dial-tex-1871.