Maddox, M. v. Wetzel, M.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Maddox, M. v. Wetzel, M.

133 A.3d 2, 635 Pa. 182, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 287, 2016 WL 742131

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 2016·No. 1 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, as it appears that Petitioner’s request for a sentence credit was addressed *183 via a January 8, 2016 determination, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2016, as it appears that Petitioner’s request for a sentence credit was addressed *183 via a January 8, 2016 determination, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Maddox, M. v. Wetzel, M., 133 A.3d 2, 635 Pa. 182, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 287, 2016 WL 742131 (Pa. 2016).

Pincite

133 A.3d 2 (Maddox, M. v. Wetzel, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.