Maddlx v. William Paley Found., Inc.

2025 NY Slip Op 30846(U)
New York Supreme Court, New York County·Decided March 17, 2025·No. Index No. 155441/2021·Unpublished

Opinion

Maddlx v William Paley Found., Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 30846(U) March 17, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155441/2021 Judge: Lisa S. Headley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 155441/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2025

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. LISA S. HEADLEY PART 28 Justice ---------•~•~T-.ow.oow•ow•• --• •=• •=•~=•==-~~----------------------- X INDEX NO. 155441 /2021 PAUL MADDlX, Plairitiff, MOTION DATE 10/09/2024

MOTION SEQ. NO. 003

1/1/lLLIAM PALEY FOU NDATfON, I NC., BLADE CONTRACT! NG. I NC., BLADE GENERAL CONTRACTING, DECISION + ORDER ON INC.,WLA ENGINEERING, P.C. MOTION Deferi dant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - T O T _____ ._ --- ---·---- ---.--.-------·---X

Toe following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number {Motion 003) 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62,63,64,65,66,67, 68, 75. 77, 82,83,84, 86 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT-SUMMARY

Plaintiff, Paul Maddix ("plaintiff"), commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he alJcgcdly sustained \vhile working at the constrnction site located at l East 53rd Street~ New York, NY l 0022 ("subject premises)) o\vncd by defendant \Vil liam Paley Foun

155441[2021 MADDlX, PAUL vs. 'WILLIAM PALEY FOUNDATION, INC. ET AL Page 1 of 4 Motion No. 003

1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 155441/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2025

I\"" cgligcncc and Labor Law §200 In support of the motion, defendant William Paley argues, infrr alia, that there was no dungerous or defective condition within the office space that w·ould trigger liability urn.l~r Tabor Law §200 or common law ncghgcncc because "this a12cident arose out or· the means, manner and method of Blade· s \Vork." (See, N"'r~\'CEF Dnc. ,Vo. 58). Therefore, Wilfoim Pale:· submits thut the plaintiff must establish that V/iHiam Paley directed and contro1led th~ plaimi Ir s injury producing \Vork. /d. In opposition, the Rhule delendunts argue, inter alia, that even though \Villiam .Paley or its representatives were not on the con.-:;truc-lion site, New York law holds the owner liable for the acts or omissions of its statutory agent. (S(;e. ,Vr"'"SCEF Doc. ;Vo. 82). WilJiam Paley, in care of Ncv,,mark (Jrubb Knight Frank, exernted a cont met dated July 20, 2017, \Vith Blade Contracting, lnc. (See, ;vrSCEF Doc. ;vo. 63). The Blade defendants argue that l

1 55441f2{121 MAD DlX, PAUL V:5. WILLI AM PALEY FOUNDA Tl ON, INC. ET AL Page 2 of 4 Motion NO, 003

[* 2] 2 of 4 INDEX NO. 155441/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 94 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2025

.. For an ovmer to be held liuble for common~]aw negligence or purslrnnt to Labor Law §200, a plainii ff must 5how thut the ow11er supervised or controlled the work or had actual or constrnctive notice ur the umufe c:ondition causing the accident.': Cuarras v. Kourkoumclis, 265 A.D.2d 293, 696 N.Y.S.2d 475 (1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maddlx v. William Paley Found., Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 30846(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

2025 NY Slip Op 30846(U) (Maddlx v. William Paley Found., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cuartas v. Kourkoumelis
265 A.D.2d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)