Maddipati v. Bucaro
892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 1995 WL 73389
Opinion
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Defendants appeal from the entry of a summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor in plaintiffs’ suit for unlawful detainer. Defendants’ only defense is a challenge to the validity of plaintiffs’ title. Issues relating to title cannot be interposed as a defense in unlawful detainer cases. Meier v. Thorpe, 822 S.W.2d 556 (Mo.App.1992) [1]; Sec. 534.210 RSMol994. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maddipati v. Bucaro, 892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 1995 WL 73389 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
892 S.W.2d 825 (Maddipati v. Bucaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meier v. Thorpe
822 S.W.2d 556 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)