Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/Maddipati v. Bucaro

Maddipati v. Bucaro

892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 1995 WL 73389
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 21, 1995
DocketNo. 66238
StatusPublished

This text of 892 S.W.2d 825 (Maddipati v. Bucaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddipati v. Bucaro, 892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 1995 WL 73389 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION

PER CURIAM.

Defendants appeal from the entry of a summary judgment in plaintiffs’ favor in plaintiffs’ suit for unlawful detainer. Defendants’ only defense is a challenge to the validity of plaintiffs’ title. Issues relating to title cannot be interposed as a defense in unlawful detainer cases. Meier v. Thorpe, 822 S.W.2d 556 (Mo.App.1992) [1]; Sec. 534.210 RSMol994. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meier v. Thorpe
822 S.W.2d 556 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 S.W.2d 825, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 1995 WL 73389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddipati-v-bucaro-moctapp-1995.