Maddillon Engine & Thresher Co. v. Thomas

87 S.E. 327, 170 N.C. 680, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 459
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 22, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 327 (Maddillon Engine & Thresher Co. v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maddillon Engine & Thresher Co. v. Thomas, 87 S.E. 327, 170 N.C. 680, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 459 (N.C. 1915).

Opinion

Pee Cubiam:.

The attention of tie profession has been called several times to the importance and necessity of setting forth in the assignments of error the grounds of the appeal, and that when this is not done the Court may of its own motion dismiss the appeal.

*681 The number of appeals and the size of the records are constantly increasing, and the Court cannot properly perform its duties unless this rule is complied with.

The assignments of error in this record furnish no information to the Court, and we cannot see from them what error, if any, has been committed, and the appeal is therefore dismissed.

We have, however, examined the record, and find that only two exceptions have been noted to parts of the charge, and there is no error in them.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poindexter v. . Call
179 S.E. 335 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1935)
Cecil v. . Lumber Company
147 S.E. 735 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)
Bridgers v. . Griffin
142 S.E. 221 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 327, 170 N.C. 680, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddillon-engine-thresher-co-v-thomas-nc-1915.