Madden's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Madden's Estate

83 Pa. Super. 197, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 98

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 28, 1924

DocketAppeals, 29 and 30

StatusPublished

This text of 83 Pa. Super. 197 (Madden's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madden's Estate, 83 Pa. Super. 197, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 98 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is said to be to the final decree dismissing appellant’s exceptions and confirming the account. The exceptions in question are not printed in the assignment. At one place in the record, we find exceptions which were filed below, — the first being as follows: “1. The auditing judge erred in dismissing the exceptions filed by Mary Madden, and said exceptions are hereby renewed” — Our inquiry would then seem to become: what were the exceptions filed, so referred to as having been dismissed, and now renewed? We cannot pursue such inquiries and we state so much of the matter only to indicate that there is a real necessity to comply with the rules of this court governing the preparation of briefs, especially in a matter however so vital as the assignments of error. We have examined the record in the light of appellant’s argument, and find no error. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The single assignment of error is said to be to the final decree dismissing appellant’s exceptions and confirming the account. The exceptions in question are not printed in the assignment. At one place in the record, we find exceptions which were filed below, — the first being as follows: “1. The auditing judge erred in dismissing the exceptions filed by Mary Madden, and said exceptions are hereby renewed” — Our inquiry would then seem to become: what were the exceptions filed, so referred to as having been dismissed, and now renewed? We cannot pursue such inquiries and we state so much of the matter only to indicate that there is a real necessity to comply with the rules of this court governing the preparation of briefs, especially in a matter however so vital as the assignments of error. We have examined the record in the light of appellant’s argument, and find no error. Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 Pa. Super. 197, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maddens-estate-pasuperct-1924.