Madden v. Stewart

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1100

RICHARD W. MADDEN, SR.; LORI M. MADDEN; TIERA R. MADDEN; AMANDA K. MADDEN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

JESSICA L. STEWART; GERRI ANN DAVIS; HONEA PATH POLICE DEPARTMENT; JIMMY KING,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (CA-03-3458-27-8)

Submitted: May 27, 2005 Decided: June 14, 2005

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard W. Madden, Sr., Lori M. Madden, Tiera R. Madden, Amanda K. Madden, Appellants Pro Se. James Victor McDade, John Michael O’Rourke, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees Honea Path Police Department and Jimmy King.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Richard W. Madden, Sr., Lori M. Madden, Tiera R. Madden,

and Amanda K. Madden appeal the district court’s order adopting the

recommendations of the magistrate judge and dismissing their action

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Madden v. Stewart, No.

CA-03-3458-27-8 (D.S.C. Dec. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -