Madden v. State

935 So. 2d 1280, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14033, 2006 WL 2419161
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 2006·No. No. 4D05-1488·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm orders denying Madden’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea and striking his motion to mitigate sentence. The record reflects no reversible error or abuse of discretion. We note that we have considered State v. Grandstaff, 927 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and deem it inapplicable.

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madden v. State, 935 So. 2d 1280, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14033, 2006 WL 2419161 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

935 So. 2d 1280 (Madden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Grandstaff
927 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)