Madden v. State

935 So. 2d 1280, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14033, 2006 WL 2419161
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 23, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-1488
StatusPublished

This text of 935 So. 2d 1280 (Madden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madden v. State, 935 So. 2d 1280, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14033, 2006 WL 2419161 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm orders denying Madden’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea and striking his motion to mitigate sentence. The record reflects no reversible error or abuse of discretion. We note that we have considered State v. Grandstaff, 927 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and deem it inapplicable.

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Grandstaff
927 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
935 So. 2d 1280, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14033, 2006 WL 2419161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madden-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.