Madden v. State

751 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 443, 2000 WL 51835
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Madden v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1607
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 2000·No. No. 1D99-2335·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a denial of a 3.800(a) motion is barred by the law of the case doctrine. See Madden v. State, 651 So.2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); see also Canty v. State, 715 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Raley v. State, 675 So.2d 170, 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, MINER, and KAHN, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madden v. State, 751 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 443, 2000 WL 51835 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

751 So. 2d 142 (Madden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raley v. State
675 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Canty v. State
715 So. 2d 1033 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Madden v. State
651 So. 2d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)