Madden v. State

751 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 443, 2000 WL 51835
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 2000
DocketNo. 1D99-2335
StatusPublished

This text of 751 So. 2d 142 (Madden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madden v. State, 751 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 443, 2000 WL 51835 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a denial of a 3.800(a) motion is barred by the law of the case doctrine. See Madden v. State, 651 So.2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); see also Canty v. State, 715 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Raley v. State, 675 So.2d 170, 173 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, MINER, and KAHN, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raley v. State
675 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Canty v. State
715 So. 2d 1033 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Madden v. State
651 So. 2d 249 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 So. 2d 142, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 443, 2000 WL 51835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madden-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.