Madden v. New York City Railway Co.

99 N.Y.S. 321
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Madden v. New York City Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 N.Y.S. 322
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 1, 1906·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff sued to recover a penalty of $50 under section 104 of the railroad law (Laws-1890, p. 1114, c. 565, as amended [322]*322by Laws 1892, p. 1406, c. 676), for refusal to give a transfer. The learned trial justice rendered judgment for defendant, and against the plaintiff, for $10 costs.

As in the other case of Madden v. Railway (No. 155 on calendar) 99 N. Y. Supp. 320, the plaintiff’s case rested solely upon certain formal admissions of defendant and the plaintiff’s own testimony. The trial justice, in order to arrive at his judgment, must have rejected the testimony of the plaintiff. For reasons similar to those set forth in action No. 155 and No. 93, we think he was not justified in so treating the plaintiff’s testimony.

The judgment should be reversed, and,a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Hull v. Littauer, 162 N. Y. 569, 57 N. E. 102; Littlefield v. Lawrence, 83 App. Div. 327, 329, 82 N. Y. Supp. 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madden v. New York City Railway Co., 99 N.Y.S. 321 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

99 N.Y.S. 321 (Madden v. New York City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hull v. . Littauer
57 N.E. 102 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Littlefield v. Lawrence
83 A.D. 327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Kappes v. New York City Railway Co.
50 Misc. 534 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)