Madden v. Madden

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Madden v. Madden

865 So. 2d 555, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19552, 2003 WL 23008791

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 24, 2003

DocketNo. 3D02-1989

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 865 So. 2d 555 (Madden v. Madden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madden v. Madden, 865 So. 2d 555, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19552, 2003 WL 23008791 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of attorney’s fees and costs to the ex-wife and against the former husband in a post-dissolution matrimonial dispute. Because we find that the evidence is insufficient to justify a determination that the “paralegals” and “law clerks” performed any “nonclerieal, meaningful legal support to the matter involved” as required by section 57.104, Florida Statutes (2003), we reduce the award by the $20,722.50 (276.3 hours at $75.00 per hour) allotted below for their services. See In re Estate of Platt, 586 So.2d 328 (Fla.1991); Dayco Products v. McLane, 690 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The order on appeal is otherwise affirmed.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an award of attorney’s fees and costs to the ex-wife and against the former husband in a post-dissolution matrimonial dispute. Because we find that the evidence is insufficient to justify a determination that the “paralegals” and “law clerks” performed any “nonclerieal, meaningful legal support to the matter involved” as required by section 57.104, Florida Statutes (2003), we reduce the award by the $20,722.50 (276.3 hours at $75.00 per hour) allotted below for their services. See In re Estate of Platt, 586 So.2d 328 (Fla.1991); Dayco Products v. McLane, 690 So.2d 654 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The order on appeal is otherwise affirmed.

Reversed in part, affirmed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

865 So. 2d 555, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19552, 2003 WL 23008791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madden-v-madden-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack