Madden Realty LLC v. Boisse

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedSeptember 30, 2016
DocketYORap-16-0023
StatusUnpublished

This text of Madden Realty LLC v. Boisse (Madden Realty LLC v. Boisse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Madden Realty LLC v. Boisse, (Me. Super. Ct. 2016).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERJOR COURT YORK, SS. Civil Action Docket No. AP-16-0023

MADDEN REALTY LLC,

Plaintiff/ Appellee,

v. ORDER

CHRISTOPHER A BOISSE

Defendant/ Appellant.

Madden Realty LLC brought a small claims action against Christopher A

Boisse to recover $6,000 in damages arising out of an alleged breach of an exclusive real

estate listing agreement. After final hearing in Biddeford on May 2, 2016, the District

Court (Foster, J.) issued a judgment for Plaintiff in the amount of $6,000 plus $106.38 in

costs. Judgment was entered on May 3, 2016.

On June 1, 2016 Mr. Boisse filed an appeal to this court. His notice of appeal

indicates: (i) Appellant "does not request a jury trial de novo;" and (ii) "[n]o electronic

or other recording of the proceedings being available, a statement in lieu of transcript

will be prepared."

The party appealing a small claims judgment to Superior Court is responsible for

complying with all rules governing appeals. M.R. Civ. P. 76F(a). Since there was

neither a transcript nor electronic recording of the hearing, Appellant is responsible for

preparing and filing a statement of the evidence and proceeding, which must be settled

and approved by the judge who heard the trial. M.R. Civ.P. 76F(a), (c). Manzo v.

Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984). Appellant has not fiied such a statement. This

court has no basis for reviewing the judgment of the District Court and therefore must

deny the appeal. Manzo, 477 A.2d at 734.

1 Accordingly, the entry shall be:

Appeal is DENIED. Judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

The clerk may incorporate this order upon the docket by reference pursuant to

Rule 79(a) of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED.

DATE: September 30, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manzo v. Reynolds
477 A.2d 732 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Madden Realty LLC v. Boisse, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madden-realty-llc-v-boisse-mesuperct-2016.