Maday v. HAROLD I. MILLER REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LEASING
731 N.W.2d 739, 478 Mich. 865, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1151
This text of 731 N.W.2d 739 (Maday v. HAROLD I. MILLER REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LEASING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Maday v. HAROLD I. MILLER REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LEASING, 731 N.W.2d 739, 478 Mich. 865, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1151 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Lawrence G. MADAY and Cheryl A. Maday, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HAROLD I. MILLER REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT & LEASING and Harold I. Miller, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 3, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
731 N.W.2d 739, 478 Mich. 865, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 1151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maday-v-harold-i-miller-real-estate-development-le-mich-2007.