Madaras v. State Accident Insurance Fund

707 P.2d 1302, 76 Or. App. 207, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3948
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 30, 1985·No. WCB No. 83-07509; CA A34544·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant seeks reversal of a Board order which reversed the referee’s determination that claimant is permanently and totally disabled for the reason that she has made no attempt to seek work, as required by ORS 656.206(3). SAIF argues that, because claimant is not totally disabled from a physical standpoint, she should be required to seek work to confirm her unemployability, unless the evidence of unemployability is clear and convincing. SAIF concedes that claimant has shown, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it would be futile for her to seek work. That is all that is required. See Morris v. Denny’s, 50 Or App 533, 623 P2d 1118 (1981).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Madaras v. State Accident Insurance Fund, 707 P.2d 1302, 76 Or. App. 207, 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3948 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

707 P.2d 1302 (Madaras v. State Accident Insurance Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Scholl
759 P.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Simpson
746 P.2d 257 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)