Madara v. Town of Lima
This text of 259 A.D. 795 (Madara v. Town of Lima) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the law and facts and for granting a new trial on the ground that the court should have charged the request that in order to render the defendant liable, the interference with travel must be dangerous, unusual or exceptional and different from the conditions ordinarily and generally brought about by the winter weather prevalent in the locality. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present —■ Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 795, 20 N.Y.S.2d 489, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madara-v-town-of-lima-nyappdiv-1940.