Madara v. Commissioners of Northumberland Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Madara v. Commissioners of Northumberland Co.

87 Pa. Super. 440, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 315

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 27, 1925

DocketAppeal 84

StatusPublished

This text of 87 Pa. Super. 440 (Madara v. Commissioners of Northumberland Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Madara v. Commissioners of Northumberland Co., 87 Pa. Super. 440, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 315 (Pa. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The appellee was appointed a viewer to inspect a county bridge which had been re-constructed by the commissioners of Northumberland County. He was injured in the same accident which caused the injuries to George Lehman, was a member of the same board of viewers, and this appeal by the defendant presents only the same questions which we have considered in an opinion this day filed in the case of Lehman v. Commissioners of Northumberland County; for the reasons in that opinion stated the assignments of error are sustained.

The judgment of the court below and the award of the Compensation Board are reversed, and judgment is here entered for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The appellee was appointed a viewer to inspect a county bridge which had been re-constructed by the commissioners of Northumberland County. He was injured in the same accident which caused the injuries to George Lehman, was a member of the same board of viewers, and this appeal by the defendant presents only the same questions which we have considered in an opinion this day filed in the case of Lehman v. Commissioners of Northumberland County; for the reasons in that opinion stated the assignments of error are sustained.

The judgment of the court below and the award of the Compensation Board are reversed, and judgment is here entered for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 Pa. Super. 440, 1926 Pa. Super. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/madara-v-commissioners-of-northumberland-co-pasuperct-1925.