Mad Dog Marketing Group, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 2014
Docket14-1091
StatusPublished

This text of Mad Dog Marketing Group, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, etc. (Mad Dog Marketing Group, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mad Dog Marketing Group, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

MAD DOG MARKETING NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO GROUP, INC., FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D14-1091 v.

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2014.

An appeal from an Order of the Department of Financial Services.

Bennett M. Miller, Law Offices of Bennett M. Miller, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Trevor S. Suter, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Financial Services, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Mad Dog Marketing Group, Inc., appeals a final order of the Department of

Financial Services imposing penalties for failure to secure workers’ compensation coverage for its employees. We affirm without comment Issues I, II, and III, but

reverse Issue IV. The department erred as a matter of law by fining appellant

$2,000.00 for continuing to operate its business in violation of the stop-work order,

because the department had not charged appellant with such violation as required

by Florida Rule of Administrative Procedure 28-106.2015(1). See, e.g., Gonzalez

v. Dep’t of Health, 120 So. 3d 234 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Trevisani v. Dep’t of

Health, 908 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Cottrill v. Dep’t of Ins., 685 So. 2d

1371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cottrill v. Department of Ins.
685 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Gonzalez v. Department of Health
120 So. 3d 234 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Trevisani v. Department of Health
908 So. 2d 1108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mad Dog Marketing Group, Inc. v. Department of Financial Services, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mad-dog-marketing-group-inc-v-department-of-financ-fladistctapp-2014.