Macy's, Inc. v. Calderon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Macy's, Inc. v. Calderon

163 So. 3d 743, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6492, 2015 WL 1959026

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 2015

DocketNo. 1D14-4582

StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 3d 743 (Macy's, Inc. v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macy's, Inc. v. Calderon, 163 So. 3d 743, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6492, 2015 WL 1959026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the employer/carrier (E/C) seeks review of a final compensation order awarding the claimant various medical and indemnity [744]*744benefits. The E/C raises five issues. We affirm four of the issues without discussion, and we affirm the fifth issue challenging the award of permanent total disability benefits between the date of “statutory” maximum medical improvement (MMI) [November 18, 2013] and the date of “actual” MMI [January 5, 2014] based on Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (en banc), which is now pending in the Florida Supreme Court in Case No. SC13-1930. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420-21 (Fla.1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the employer/carrier (E/C) seeks review of a final compensation order awarding the claimant various medical and indemnity [744]*744benefits. The E/C raises five issues. We affirm four of the issues without discussion, and we affirm the fifth issue challenging the award of permanent total disability benefits between the date of “statutory” maximum medical improvement (MMI) [November 18, 2013] and the date of “actual” MMI [January 5, 2014] based on Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (en banc), which is now pending in the Florida Supreme Court in Case No. SC13-1930. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420-21 (Fla.1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 So. 3d 743, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6492, 2015 WL 1959026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macys-inc-v-calderon-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack