Macy v. Goldberg
253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1937·Published
Opinion
Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim contained in the amended answer on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiffs to reply to the counterclaim within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opimon. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Macy v. Goldberg, 253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
253 A.D. 759 (Macy v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.