Macy v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Macy v. Goldberg

253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 24, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 759 (Macy v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macy v. Goldberg, 253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim contained in the amended answer on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiffs to reply to the counterclaim within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opimon. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the counterclaim contained in the amended answer on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiffs to reply to the counterclaim within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opimon. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 759, 1 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macy-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1937.