Macy v. Eller
This text of 11 Ind. 352 (Macy v. Eller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The errors assigned are—
1. Default ought not to have been taken, and judgment rendered, on the same day (the second) of the term on which the defendant was summoned to appear.
The record shows that the default, &c., was on the third day; but it would not have been error on the second day.
2. The assessment of damages is wrong.
It appears to have been for the note and interest.
3. The Court should have set aside the default on defendant’s motion, &c.
The record does not disclose any motion by the defendant.
These are all the points made.
The judgment is affirmed, with 5 per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Ind. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macy-v-eller-ind-1858.