Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/MacTaggart v. State

MacTaggart v. State

462 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12127
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 25, 1985
DocketNo. 84-982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 462 So. 2d 603 (MacTaggart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacTaggart v. State, 462 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the appellant’s conviction is affirmed. However, we must remand to the trial court because of a clerical error in the court’s written judgment.

Appellant was found guilty of armed trespass. The written judgment, however, states his offense as burglary. The written judgment must be corrected to show that appellant was convicted of armed trespass, not burglary. Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of this error.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. State
499 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mactaggart-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.