MacTaggart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

MacTaggart v. State

462 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12127

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 1985·No. No. 84-982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the appellant’s conviction is affirmed. However, we must remand to the trial court because of a clerical error in the court’s written judgment.

Appellant was found guilty of armed trespass. The written judgment, however, states his offense as burglary. The written judgment must be corrected to show that appellant was convicted of armed trespass, not burglary. Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of this error.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record on appeal, we find that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error; therefore, the appellant’s conviction is affirmed. However, we must remand to the trial court because of a clerical error in the court’s written judgment.

Appellant was found guilty of armed trespass. The written judgment, however, states his offense as burglary. The written judgment must be corrected to show that appellant was convicted of armed trespass, not burglary. Accordingly, we remand this cause to the trial court for correction of this error.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and FRANK, JJ., concur.

MacTaggart v. State, 462 So. 2d 603, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 253, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

462 So. 2d 603 (MacTaggart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related