Macswan (Matthew) Vs. Dist. Ct. (The City Of Henderson)

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 13, 2020·No. 81727·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MATTHEW DAVID MACSWAN, No. 81727 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE NOV 1 3 2020 RICHARD SCOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE CITY OF HENDERSON, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This petition for a writ of certiorari or, alternatively a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order decision in a misdemeanor appeal. We are not satisfied that petitioner has established this court's intervention by way of an extraordinary writ is warranted. See Zamccrripa v. First Judicial Dist. Court, 103 Nev. 638, 640, 747 P.2d 1386, 1387 (1987) (recognizing that a writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and the decision to entertain such a writ lies within the discretion of this court); Poulos v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 98 Nev. 453, 455, 652 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1982) (recognizing that it is within the discretion of this court to determine if a petition for extraordinary relief will be considered). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

i , J. J. SUPREME COURT Hardesty Cadish OF NEVADA

(0) I947A cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Henderson City Attorney Las Vegas Defense Group, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 ju) I 9479

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macswan (Matthew) Vs. Dist. Ct. (The City Of Henderson), (Neb. 2020).

Macswan (Matthew) Vs. Dist. Ct. (The City Of Henderson) (Macswan (Matthew) Vs. Dist. Ct. (The City Of Henderson)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poulos v. Eighth Judicial District Court
652 P.2d 1177 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1982)
Zamarripa v. First Judicial District Court
747 P.2d 1386 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1987)