Macro Capital Corp. v. Soffer Group ex rel. Soffer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Macro Capital Corp. v. Soffer Group ex rel. Soffer

822 So. 2d 525, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10043, 2002 WL 1560234

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 2002·No. No. 3D02-467·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHEVIN, Judge.

We grant Macro-Capital Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari, and quash the portions of the trial court’s order that reserve jurisdiction over discovery as the cause proceeds in arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. The court departed from the essential requirements of law in making such a reservation. Suarez-Valdez v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc., 858 F.2d 648, 649 (11th Cir. 1988); see § 382.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2002); Greenstein v. Baxas Howell Mobley, Inc., 583 So.2d 402, 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Certiorari granted; order quashed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHEVIN, Judge.

We grant Macro-Capital Corporation’s petition for writ of certiorari, and quash the portions of the trial court’s order that reserve jurisdiction over discovery as the cause proceeds in arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act. The court departed from the essential requirements of law in making such a reservation. Suarez-Valdez v. Shearson Lehman/American Express, Inc., 858 F.2d 648, 649 (11th Cir. 1988); see § 382.03(3), Fla. Stat. (2002); Greenstein v. Baxas Howell Mobley, Inc., 583 So.2d 402, 403 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Certiorari granted; order quashed in part.

Macro Capital Corp. v. Soffer Group ex rel. Soffer, 822 So. 2d 525, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10043, 2002 WL 1560234 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

822 So. 2d 525 (Macro Capital Corp. v. Soffer Group ex rel. Soffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related