Macri v. Daien
This text of 271 A.D.2d 831 (Macri v. Daien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage resulting from the collision of plaintiff’s automobile and defendant’s taxicab, judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The evidence presented by plaintiff raised questions of fact as to the negligence of the defendant and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.D.2d 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macri-v-daien-nyappdiv-1946.