Macri v. Carlucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Macri v. Carlucci

177 A.D. 933

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1917·No. Appeal No. 1; Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

The complaint states a cause of action of trespass on plaintiff’s person. (Sullivan v. Dunham, 161 N. Y. 290.) Allegations of negligence and carelessness are irrelevant and not proper subjects of a bill of particulars. The order appealed from is, therefore, modified by striking out all allusions to charges of negligence, and eliminating the provision for a reference. This leaves in force the requirements for the bill of particulars numbered first, third and fourth, which plaintiff is to give within thirty days, with a stay until complied with. As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Putnam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The complaint states a cause of action of trespass on plaintiff’s person. (Sullivan v. Dunham, 161 N. Y. 290.) Allegations of negligence and carelessness are irrelevant and not proper subjects of a bill of particulars. The order appealed from is, therefore, modified by striking out all allusions to charges of negligence, and eliminating the provision for a reference. This leaves in force the requirements for the bill of particulars numbered first, third and fourth, which plaintiff is to give within thirty days, with a stay until complied with. As thus modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before Mr. Justice Putnam.

Macri v. Carlucci, 177 A.D. 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

177 A.D. 933 (Macri v. Carlucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related