Macon v. Sullivan
This text of 124 A.D.2d 731 (Macon v. Sullivan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondents’ determination which denied the petitioner’s application to participate in the Work Release Program was reached after consideration of all appropriate factors and was not affected by irrationality bordering on impropriety (see, Matter of Gonzalez v Wilson, 106 AD2d 386; Matter of Hoffman v Wilson, 86 AD2d 735).
We have considered the contentions raised in the petition[732]*732er’s pro se brief and find them to be without merit. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.2d 731, 507 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-v-sullivan-nyappdiv-1986.