Macon v. State
596 So. 2d 769, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3883, 1992 WL 63948
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 1992·No. No. 91-1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Gary L. Macon appeals his sentence entered after he pled to a multi-count information. He contends that the court failed to follow the plea agreement by not ordering the minimum mandatory terms for two counts to run concurrent. However, since the judge did not order the sentences to run consecutive, section 921.16(1), Fla.Stat. (1991) requires that they run concurrent.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Macon v. State, 596 So. 2d 769, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3883, 1992 WL 63948 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
596 So. 2d 769 (Macon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Colon v. State
905 So. 2d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)