Macon v. Cox

Fourth Circuit

Macon v. Cox

172 F. App'x 555

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2006·No. No. 05-7371·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommenda[556]*556tion of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v. Cox, No. CA-04-1311-6-HFF (D.S.C. June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommenda[556]*556tion of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v. Cox, No. CA-04-1311-6-HFF (D.S.C. June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Macon v. Cox, 172 F. App'x 555 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

172 F. App'x 555 (Macon v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related