Macon v. Cox

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2006
Docket05-7371
StatusUnpublished

This text of Macon v. Cox (Macon v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Macon v. Cox, (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7371

JOSEPH E. MACON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES M. COX, JR., Judge; H. LOWERY, Attorney; THE CITY OF WILLIAMSTON, NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-1311-6-HFF)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Macon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v. Cox,

No. CA-04-1311-6-HFF (D.S.C. June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Macon v. Cox, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-v-cox-ca4-2006.