Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Yesbik

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Yesbik

79 S.E. 243, 13 Ga. App. 407, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 175

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 9, 1913

Docket4963

StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.E. 243 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Yesbik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Yesbik, 79 S.E. 243, 13 Ga. App. 407, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

1. It is no ground for rejecting answers to interrogatories that one set of questions was propounded to two witnesses, each of whom made separate answers to, the interrogatories.

2. All of the other questions made in the record were settled adversely to the plaintiff in error when the case was before this court at a previous term. Yesbik v. Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co., 11 Ga. App. 298 (75 S. E. 207). There is no evidence in the present record that the damage to the goods resulted from a compliance by the initial carrier with instructions given by the shipper. The evidence demanded the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

John 8. Adams, Charles Alcerman, for plaintiff in error. W. C. Davis, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI