Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright
50 S.E. 466, 122 Ga. 654, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 291
Opinion
Had this case been on trial before a jury upon the evidence introduced at the hearing before the magistrate, it would have been error for the court to direct a verdict, as an issue of fact was formed. Therefore, under the rule laid down by this court in Toole v. Edmondson, 104 Ga. 784, the certiorari was properly dismissed on the ground that appeal to a. jury [655] in the justice’s court was the plaintiff's remedy. See also, in this connection, Dotson v. Hawes, 120 Ga. 369.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright, 50 S.E. 466, 122 Ga. 654, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 291 (Ga. 1905).
50 S.E. 466 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnston v. Brenau College-Conservatory
91 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Schultes v. Campos
63 S.E. 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)