Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright

50 S.E. 466, 122 Ga. 654, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 291
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 27, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 466 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright, 50 S.E. 466, 122 Ga. 654, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 291 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Candles, J.

Had this case been on trial before a jury upon the evidence introduced at the hearing before the magistrate, it would have been error for the court to direct a verdict, as an issue of fact was formed. Therefore, under the rule laid down by this court in Toole v. Edmondson, 104 Ga. 784, the certiorari was properly dismissed on the ground that appeal to a. jury [655]*655in the justice’s court was the plaintiff's remedy. See also, in this connection, Dotson v. Hawes, 120 Ga. 369.

Argued March 10, — Decided March 27, 1905. Certiorari. Before Judge Cann. Chatham superior court. December 10, 1904. Saussy & Saussy, for plaintiff in error. Anton P. Wright, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnston v. Brenau College-Conservatory
91 S.E. 85 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Schultes v. Campos
63 S.E. 23 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 S.E. 466, 122 Ga. 654, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-dublin-savannah-railroad-v-wright-ga-1905.