Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright
This text of 50 S.E. 466 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Had this case been on trial before a jury upon the evidence introduced at the hearing before the magistrate, it would have been error for the court to direct a verdict, as an issue of fact was formed. Therefore, under the rule laid down by this court in Toole v. Edmondson, 104 Ga. 784, the certiorari was properly dismissed on the ground that appeal to a. jury [655]*655in the justice’s court was the plaintiff's remedy. See also, in this connection, Dotson v. Hawes, 120 Ga. 369.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 S.E. 466, 122 Ga. 654, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-dublin-savannah-railroad-v-wright-ga-1905.