Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Stinson
74 S.E. 858, 11 Ga. App. 110, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 280
This text of 74 S.E. 858 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Stinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Stinson, 74 S.E. 858, 11 Ga. App. 110, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 280 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
Opinion
Though there was evidence on the part of the employees of the defendant railroad company rebutting the usual presumption, there is in the record sufficient evidence, introduced in behalf of the plaintiff, contradictory of this testimony, to fully authorize the verdict rendered. There was, therefore, no error in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 858, 11 Ga. App. 110, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-dublin-savannah-railroad-v-stinson-gactapp-1912.