Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Fuller & Son
65 S.E. 299, 6 Ga. App. 499, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 353
This text of 65 S.E. 299 (Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Fuller & Son) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Fuller & Son, 65 S.E. 299, 6 Ga. App. 499, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 353 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
The evidence did not require the jury to find that the statutory presumption of negligence, arising upon proof that the mule was killed by the ears of the railroad company, was rebutted so as to defeat the plaintiff’s recovery. The issue was one of fact, peculiarly within the province of the jury, and it was not error to refuse a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 299, 6 Ga. App. 499, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macon-dublin-savannah-railroad-v-fuller-son-gactapp-1909.