Macomber v. United States
This text of 101 F. App'x 715 (Macomber v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Norman Macomber, Jr. appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his action against the United States, President George Bush, Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle, and other state and local executive and judicial officials in Macomber’s action alleging claims of conspiracy and racial discrimination against native Hawaiians, arising when Macomber was prosecuted in state court for a criminal operation upon Hawaii homelands. Macomber alleges that his arrest violated the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Hawaii and his rights as a Native Hawaiian living on Hawaiian home lands because the state has no authority on the home lands.
We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its order filed on October 7, 2003.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 F. App'x 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macomber-v-united-states-ca9-2004.