Macomber v. Clarke
This text of 16 F. Cas. 337 (Macomber v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The CouRT (Thruston, J., absent,) said that there must be an order of the Court for the production of the papers, which order must be served upon the party a reasonable time before the time for producing them; and that the party must have reasonable notice of the motion for the order.
On motion of Mr. Coxe, and with the assent of the defendant’s counsel, a juror was withdrawn, and the cause continued ; the Court said it must be without costs, as the defendant had elected a continuance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F. Cas. 337, 3 D.C. 347, 3 Cranch 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macomber-v-clarke-circtddc-1828.